Clecha

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853485647
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4155957949
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,068,543
Expenses
$1,161,234
Assets
$397,603
Liabilities
$182,739

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GILBERT GALLEGOS (President)
  • RAFAEL LOSNO (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • XIOMARA GRANDE (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CONNIE RIVERA (BOARD MEMBER)
  • WILLIAM ORTIZ-CARTAGENA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CLECHA, a Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation in the State of California, exists to ensure Latinas and Latinos understand, navigate, and conquer the oppressive systems that exist in order to achieve financial equity.

What it reported doing in 2024

CLECHA, a Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation in the State of California, exists to ensure Latinas and Latinos understand, navigate, and conquer the oppressive systems that exist in order to achieve financial equity. In 2024, CLECHA continued to strengthen its role as a trusted advocate and technical assistance provider for small businesses across San Francisco. The organization provided direct, one-on-one guidance to more than ninety entrepreneurs, assisting with licensing, FTB compliance, CDTFA sales tax registration, EIN filings, LLC formation, and business stabilization support. Clecha's work ensured that many neighborhood businesses could remain operational, compliant, and prepared for long-term growth.Throughout the year, Clecha supported several grand openings and business expansions, including Taboo, Mission Barbershop, and Murales Wine Bar and Tapas. Each business represented a new step toward neighborhood revitalization and the preservation of cultural and creative spaces in the Mission District. Clecha provided hands-on support with marketing, permitting, and event coordination to help launch each event successfully.Marketing remained a key focus of Clecha's 2024 programming. The organization launched targeted campaigns to boost visibility for small businesses across the Mission, Excelsior, and Visitacion Valley, emphasizing locally owned, culturally rooted enterprises. Clecha worked directly with business owners to develop promotional materials, social media content, and neighborhood branding efforts that strengthened corridor identity and community engagement.In 2024, the city of San Francisco turned to Clecha to resolve a crisis at 16th and Mission, the neighborhood that was the core of drug dealers and illegal vending. As a result of Clecha's aid, the streets became cleaner, illegal activity was deterred, and homeless people and drug users were connected to city services.In partnership with the city and community organizations, Clecha also distributed free laptops to small business owners through the Human-I-T digital inclusion initiative. This effort provided entrepreneurs with the tools needed to manage their finances, improve marketing, and expand their online presence, addressing the ongoing digital divide faced by many immigrant and low-income business owners.Clecha additionally played an active role in supporting San Francisco Green Business initiatives, helping businesses adopt environmentally conscious practices and move toward official certification. This included assisting with waste reduction strategies, energy efficiency improvements, and city compliance requirements that align with sustainable operating goals.By the end of 2024, Clecha had strengthened the capacity and visibility of dozens of neighborhood businesses through a combination of technical support, marketing campaigns, and community investment. The organization's consistent, culturally informed approach continued to advance equitable economic growth and highlight the vital role of small businesses in the fabric of San Francisco's neighborhoods.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 12
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 71.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 51.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.