Clearwater Trail Blazers Snowmobile Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363485242
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bagley, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2183580933
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,437
- Expenses
- $81,749
- Assets
- $524,562
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOM HJORT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GAIL FRIBORG (SECRETARY): $599 total reported compensation
- RUBEN JOHNSON (TREASURER): $599 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a local snowmobile club which promotes and facilitates snowmobiling by developing and maintaining a system of trails as part of the Minnesota statewide trail network for public use. The club also promotes snowmobile safety, sponsors trail rides, assists in rescue work occassionally and meets regularily.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization's charitable gambling fund supports various local community organizations and celebrations to support the area's youth and residents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, 35% for grants, and 3% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 66.2%; rating input score 66; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.42; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 10 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $599 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.