Clear Voice Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820546229
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Athol, ID, USA
- Phone
- 8008751776
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,709
- Expenses
- $43,888
- Assets
- $214,449
- Liabilities
- $2,892
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kim Kjaer (President)
People named in this filing
- Kim Kjaer (President)
- Judith Kjaer (Secretary)
- Linda DeRomanett (Officer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Clear Voice provides Bible educational programs and services in the United States as well as internationally. Clear Voice conducts Bible seminars for the general public, online educational courses, public events that showcase physical models of Bible symbols designed to awaken inquiry into the teachings of the Bible. Public seminars and events have been conducted or attended in Maryland, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Internationally, Clear Voice has conducted Bible seminars in Canada, Malaysia, Germany and Czech Republic.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clear Voice undertook a major program this past year. We spent several months planning for building and displaying large statues of Bible prophecy symbols. These statues were utilized in public conferences and public Bible lectures.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.89; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 1 filing year from 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.