Clear Creek ISD Support Group Dba Clear Lake HS Baseball Booster Clb

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300129714
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,749
Expenses
$32,271
Assets
$33,287

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eduardo Ervesun (President)
  • Ron Klinger (Vice President)
  • Brian Grill (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Eduardo Ervesun (President)
  • Ron Klinger (Vice President)
  • Greg Mihaly (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of the Clear Lake High School Baseball Booster Club is to support the Clear Lake High School baseball programs three teams (sophomore, junior varsity and varsity), through fundraising, concessions operations, sponsorship sales and donations . Our all-volunteer members and officers ensure all proceeds, and the above costs and expenses, directly benefit the baseball program and its approximately 60 student-athletes. Key accomplishments for the year included providing $10,000 worth of new training equipment for the baseball programs training facilities, funding the annual baseball banquet and award program (including a $1,000 scholarship to a graduating senior) and providing additional field and batting cage maintenance beyond what the school is able to provide.

What it reported doing in 2024

Used to purchase Rapsodo training system for the team (radar/laser technology used to teach/train/improve batting and pitching skills). Total cost of the system was $9,099. The baseball head coach was able to contribute $4,000 of the purchase price out of his school budget to help offset the total cost. Only by the booster club paying the difference was the Rapsodo purchase possible.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 48.2%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34% of revenue deployed · 48.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.