Clean Water Socal Dba Scap
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330526756
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Encinitas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7604154332
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $535,676
- Expenses
- $495,069
- Assets
- $639,029
- Liabilities
- $274,188
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE JEPSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LAN WIBORG (PRESIDENT)
- ROBERT DELGADO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEVE JEPSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ROWENA LAU (BOARD MEMBER)
- TOM MOODY (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Education - wastewater treatment
What it reported doing in 2025
To promote public health, safety & welfare through education and information dissemination relative to new requirements & processes for wastewater treatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $491K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $438K reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.