Clean Energy Economy Minnesota

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812294812
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6127439157
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Quality, Protection, and Beautification N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,610,940
Expenses
$1,673,703
Assets
$201,456
Liabilities
$77,306

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GREGG MAST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • GREGG MAST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $137,585 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide educational leadership, collaboration, and policy analysis that accelerates clean energy market growth and smart energy policies.

What it reported doing in 2024

State policy analysis: ceem, working alongside its business members, built upon the historic and unprecedented 2023 Minnesota legislative session for climate and energy policy with significant policy wins and forward progress in 2024. Heading into the 2024 legislative session, ceem's four priority policy objectives were 1.) advance smart implementation 2.) permitting reform 3.) expand transmission and 4.) support increased and timely interconnection. Clean energy permitting reform was one of the most substantial energy and economic development policies passed in the 2024 legislative session. Permitting reform is essential to Minnesota's law of achieving 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040. Ceem played a crucial role in educating policymakers resulting in the passage of the energy infrastructure permitting act that streamlines the permitting process for large-scale energy projects at the Minnesota public utilities commission (puc). This legislation reduces bureaucratic redundancies and improves efficiencies, facilitating the timely development of wind, solar, and battery storage projects. These reforms are vital for overcoming the largest roadblock to renewable energy deployment, demonstrating Minnesota's commitment to embracing the clean energy transition and unlocking its full potential. Another policy win for the organization relieves grid congestion and requires utilities to evaluate grid enhancing technologies (gets) on highly congested lines. Gets include dynamic line rating, power-flow control devices, and analytical tools that reduce the need for new infrastructure and support the integration of renewables and maximize the grid's current capacity. Another essential piece of energy infrastructure completed in this session with ceem's education efforts included allowing the co-location of utility and high-voltage transmission infrastructure in existing transportation corridors, like highways and interstates, to speed development that is critical for the clean energy transition. Additional policies that ceem led and/or supported that were passed into law included updates to commercial property assessed clean energy (c-pace), interconnection reforms for distributed generation, updates to streamline the implementation of Minnesota's energy conservation and optimization act (eco), an additional $50 million in funding for solar*rewards over the next ten years, along with workforce development and geothermal legislation to expand markets and support deployment. The organization's two annual reports, the 2024 Minnesota energy factsheet and the 2024 clean jobs midwest - Minnesota report contained timely and detailed information on clean energy markets and jobs that were utilized by the walz-flanagan administration, policymakers, media, and the public. Data and recommendations contained in the publications provided crucial facts and information utilized in conversations and presentations with policymakers, decision-makers, and the public to hasten the transition to a low- and zero-carbon future in Minnesota.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 12 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $202K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.