Clean Energy Association of New Mexico
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 995001667
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Grants, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5053090921
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $12,155
- Assets
- $100
- Liabilities
- $12,255
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANET LEE-SHERIFF (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JANET LEE-SHERIFF (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
- MARK PELIZZA (SECRETARY, TREASURER AND DIRECTOR)
- BENJAMIN RUSS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide education, awareness and innovatice tools to support a safe, sustainable nuclear energy sector sensitive to the environment and communities. To build sustainable economic benefits for communities and nm respecting the land, water, air, & people.
What it reported doing in 2024
We aim to educate on the benefits of nuclear energy, highlighting its advancement in safety through the use of innovative in situ recovery ( isr ) technology, known for its exemplary safety record and minimal environmental footprint. We want to empower the people of New Mexico by fostering economic growth through educational initiatives and create meaningful impact within the community by actively engaging in various outreach initiatives. This includes launching workshops, granting scholarships, working with elders and establishing a curriculum to educate youth with a focus on sustainable, clean technologies. Our long-term goal is to create job opportunities within the nuclear sector in New Mexico that are exclusively supported by isr technology.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 122.55; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.