Clean Air Distribution Network Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922693919
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9519235998
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,693
Expenses
$6,780
Assets
$2,985
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James K Furukawa (President, CEO, Treasurer, Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • James K Furukawa (President, CEO, Treasurer, Secretary)
  • Britta Shoot (Researcher)
  • Will Udovich (Researcher)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To freely distribute devices and supplies for the prevention of illness caused by air pollution and airborne diseases.

What it reported doing in 2025

CADiN provided fiscal sponsorships as part of a fiscal sponsorship program to two smaller, non-tax-exempt volunteer organizations that enabled each to solicit and receive tax-deductible in-kind donations of thousands of N95 and KN95 respirators from businesses. 3,500 total KN95 and N95 masks, a collective value of $3,799, were sent to our fiscal sponsees through our fiscal sponsorship program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 148% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 125% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 104.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.