Clayville Library Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161366905
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Clayville, NY, USA
Phone
3158395893
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$178,769
Expenses
$90,549
Assets
$226,126
Liabilities
$39,748

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOREEN BRENNAN-MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DOREEN BRENNAN-MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • CONNIE STAYTON (VICE PRESIDE)
  • TODD STEELE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The clayville library association is an association library serving more than 3,000 residents of the village of clayville and the town of paris. The library is a popular materials lending library. The library also holds several programs during the year, free to the public, encompassing a variety of topics and holiday celebrations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Association library providing materials lending and programming for all ages, electronic doorway library, open 25 hours per week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.6%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.3%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $91K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.