Clayton Contributes Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863735138
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
7203551712
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$5,273
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Dan Vecchiarelli (Authorized Signatory)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Clayton contributes fund organizes, inspires and harnesses the power of the clayton members and the local community to enable lasting impact for historically underserved or excluded denver communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Clayton Contributes Fund will identify, research, develop relationships with, provide tools to empower, and invest in local, community-based, non-profit organizations. Specifically, Clayton Contributes will work to champion NPOs who demonstrate their shared commitment to our OEI-centered mission and values, and who are working actively with historically underserved or excluded Denver communities to affect positive change. We will build a sustaining, regenerating fund to give back to historically underserved or excluded communities in Denver and will work to cultivate and demonstrate Clayton's passion for and dedication to the advancement of "experiential" philanthropy.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -53% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -76.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.