Clarksburg Mission Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237177860
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Clarksburg, WV, USA
Phone
3046222451
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$984,040
Expenses
$980,777
Assets
$614,420
Liabilities
$119,798

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PEYDON MICHAEL (PRESIDENT)
  • DESI UNDERWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JASON NICHOLSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOSH BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JARROD MAROZZI (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DESI UNDERWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $75,215 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The clarksburg mission provides food, clothing and shelter to homelessand needy individuals. We also provide training, ministry and coaching as needed

What it reported doing in 2024

The clarksburg mission provides long term residential housing for participants focused on the addiction recovery. The mission maintainsa capacity of 75 residents, averaging 35-40 residents at any time. The mission maintains 2 sober living houses as well, with a capacity of 25 residents between the 2 houses. The mission also operates a food and clothing rescue program, feeding 500 households a month and recycling 20 tons of clothing a month.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 44.4%; rating input score 44; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.1% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $915K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.