Clarity Organization Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861128653
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Midlothian, VA, USA
Phone
8044674607
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,177
Expenses
$61,858
Assets
$19,612

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GREGORY MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GREGORY MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • LORA FRANKLIN (VP COMM ENRI)
  • LAURA EKLUND (VP STUDENT A)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

-to provide supplemental financial support to center for leadership and international relations through membership dues, community/corporate sponsorships, grants, and appropriate 501(c)(3) fundraising activities. -to identify educational, international, and or service opportunities for students to achieve fullest potential in stimulating and supportive environments. -to support the mission, objectives, and constitution of the center for leadership and international relations as defined by the students, center director, and leadership faculty. -to assist leadership faculty and students with identifying guest speakers that will enhance curriculum. -to promote communication by providing a forum for the exchange of ideas and information among students, parents, faculty, and community. -to provide support for capstone projects for the seniors in the center.

What it reported doing in 2022

Center support provided support to the teachers and students of the center for leadership and international relations at james river high school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.