Claretian Teaching Ministry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954280743
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Temple City, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3107826408
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,572
- Expenses
- $38,314
- Assets
- $65,410
- Liabilities
- $574
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- PAUL KELLER (Chairman)
- THOMAS MCGANN (Treasurer)
- EDDIE DE LEON (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1) preparation, manufacture, and dissemination of all religious and spiritual materials created under the auspices of the committee or approved by the board of directors.2) counseling, guidance, and healing of emotional and spiritual problems through direct, recorded, and written communication.3) inspire new, renewed, and increased faith in god. create a spiritual uplift for all catholics and Christians.4) conduct all activities and business affairs in an ethical and catholic manner.5) provide financial support for the USA province of the Claretian missionaries through the sale of catholic-Christian religious materials. With donations as often and in such amounts as are economically feasible.
What it reported doing in 2025
The sale of: books, booklets, dvd's, and religious articles.note: see sales revenue and cost of goods sold.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.