Claremont McKenna College
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951664101
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Claremont, CA, US
- Phone
- (909) 621-8356
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $275,743,084
- Expenses
- $222,099,203
- Assets
- $2,708,910,623
- Liabilities
- $644,554,144
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
59 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Hiram Chodosh (President)
Highest reported compensation
- James Floyd (VP and Chief Investment Officer): $1,393,195 total reported compensation
- Hiram Chodosh (President): $904,143 total reported compensation
- Michael Denny (AVP for Investments): $761,480 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preparing students for thoughtful and productive lives and responsible leadership in business, government, and the professions.
What it reported doing in 2024
See Schedule OClaremont McKenna College, one of the nation's top liberal arts colleges, prepares students to make a difference. Since 1946, Claremont McKenna College's mission has been to prepare students for thoughtful and productive lives and responsible leadership in business, government, and the professions. The College attracts a student bodythat is broadly diverse and accomplished beyond the classroom.Claremont McKenna is a member of The Claremont Colleges, a seven-college consortium modeled after Oxford University. Students have the best of both worlds: the intimacy of a small residential college with small classes and a student-faculty ratio of eight to one, and the shared resources of a larger research university.Renowned for expertise in economics, government, humanities, and the sciences, Claremont McKenna has been a leader in freedom of expression, viewpoint diversity, and constructive dialogue, as well as institutional neutrality through The Open Academy. The College emphasizes the integration of leadership and innovation experience within eleven world-class research institutes, the Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum, and sponsored off-campus internships. More than 90% of students complete internships and nearly half study off-campus during their four years.The Soll Center for Student Opportunity provides all students with advising, mentoring and networking support that is tailored to each student's professional goals. Many Claremont McKenna graduates go on to receive prestigious post-graduate fellowships and degrees in business, law, medicine, and many other fields. CMC alumni thrive in a wide range of careers including consulting, education, business, government, media, nonprofit leadership, science, and technology. Claremont McKenna excels nationally in post-graduate job placement and career success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, 20% for grants, and 3% for affiliated organizations.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 96
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97.6%; rating input score 98; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.5%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.2; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 40 of 41 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $176.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 59 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $69.8M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.