Claremont Junior All American Football and Cheer
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201439905
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Claremont, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9096267520
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,136
- Expenses
- $30,384
- Assets
- $8,680
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VINCE ARRIOLA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VINCE ARRIOLA (PRESIDENT)
- TERESSA SANCHEZ (EXECUTIVE AD)
- CHERISH SALCEDO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide youth sports and education.
What it reported doing in 2013
The 2013 claremont wolfpack jr. All american football & cheer youth organization experienced another successful youth football campaign. The claremont organization was successful in sponsoring and granting "50% scholarships" to (24) twenty-four youth football players. The amount of sponsorship requests & funding represented the average scholarships granted on a yearly basis. The organization is proud to have been able to assist families that would have otherwise been unable to register their child(ren) in the youth football experience. The claremont organization also organized free youth football off-season conditioning clinics during the months of: march through june; it was aimed at offering a positive experience in the areas of: football, conditioning and competition. This free clinic attracted over 300 participants from all over the san gabriel valley. Finally, the league was able to self-sustain and field (4) four youth football teams in a financially restrictive environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.9%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.9% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.