Civil Service Employees Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
112555346
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Commack, NY, USA
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,612
Expenses
$192,270
Assets
$10,288

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jarvis T Brown (President)
  • John Mooney (Executive Vice President)
  • Michael Errico (1st Vice President)
  • Guadalupe Johnson (2nd Vice President)
  • Kris Kalender (3rd Vice President)
  • George Storm (4th Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jarvis T Brown (President)
  • John Mooney (Executive Vice President)
  • Michael Errico (1st Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CSEA represents employees and its membership coordinates with Locals and Units in labor related matters with respective to employees. CSEA attends various unions events such as workshops and conventions. Participates in contract negotiations organizes job training and educational classes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Annual workshop and Education Convention was held Sept 18,19,20 & 21 where we provide the members with education they use for negotiating contract member engagement assist members with management conflicts prepare for civil service testing promotions and retirement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.5%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -33%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -79.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.