CityTeam
Legal name: Cityteam Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941501265
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 408.232.5600
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39,380,254
- Expenses
- $35,813,247
- Assets
- $86,007,274
- Liabilities
- $11,440,544
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLEN PETERSON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GLEN PETERSON (PRESIDENT): $271,706 total reported compensation
- JILL AUFRICHT (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $207,605 total reported compensation
- MELANIE DAVIS (VP OF MARKETING AND DEVELO): $142,389 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Love your neighbor We desire to share Christ’s unconditional and redemptive love by caring for immediate needs and enabling lasting solutions. We give people access to education and job skills training that helps them find a living wage job and stable housing. We empower individuals to support themselves and their families. Community Building. Our Vision Leading people We are restoring lives and rebuilding communities through innovative programs which provide food, shelter, clothing, training, and spiritual transformation. We are restoring lives and rebuilding communities through innovative programs which provide food, shelter, clothing, training, and spiritual transformation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Economic empowerment (cityteam @ work) - education, training, and certification programs to help men and women in our residential programs find living-wage jobs, affordable housing, and budget for financial sustainability. The level of education for each student varies widely, with some participants who never completed high school, while others hold college degrees. Each student has an individualized learning plan to master skills in writing, math, reading, comprehension, and computer literacy. Life skills are an important element of the learning and career center, which ensure students know how to make and keep a budget, write a resume, and interview for a job. We also provide business clothes for interviews.bridge housing (cityteam forward) - affordable living to help graduates move forward as active members of the community and create a strong foundation for bringing families back together.youth housing (cityteam youth collective) - residential supportive housing program helping to prevent homelessness by providing a loving community for at-risk youth. Aproximately 2,400 nights of housing provided.cityteam ministries also offers family and youth camping, and other essential services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 60% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 89
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.4; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $29.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $272K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.8M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.