City on a Hill Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421724096
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Garden City, KS, USA
- Phone
- 6202760840
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,448,965
- Expenses
- $1,300,322
- Assets
- $1,524,418
- Liabilities
- $680,186
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Donna Daly (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Miranda Unruh (Executive Dir.): $75,975 total reported compensation
- Donna Daly (Vice President): $52,082 total reported compensation
- Albert Daly (Secretary): $50,542 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
City on a Hill is a faith based organization which provides residential substance abuse treatment services to adult women and outpatient substance abuse counseling services to all persons who need such services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Level one outpatient substance abuse treatment for men, women, and adolescents at the Garden City facility. Outpatient services consist of 3 to 4 hours of group and individual substance abuse treatment weekly. The duration of outpatient treatment is generally 12 weeks. We also provide drug and alcohol evaluation, assessment, and referral for the proper placement of all clients seeking services at our facility. Education is a service offered for those men, women, and adolescents who do not meet certain criteria. A one day educational class is conducted for 8 hours to educate these clients as to the dangers associated with alcohol and drug abuse. The class usually has between 10 to 13 students and is held the last Friday of each month. We also offer supportive housing for women in recovery in Garden City, KS. Support staff assist women in the house find jobs, connect them to community resources, and housing when they are ready. The goal of the program is to provide women with the necessary support to be successful in their recovery when returning to the community from residential treatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $931K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.