City of Lakes Community Land Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061665031
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6125947150
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,142,461
- Expenses
- $3,512,334
- Assets
- $31,414,217
- Liabilities
- $14,670,112
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA REESE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREA REESE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $124,650 total reported compensation
- STACI HORWITZ (OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $107,061 total reported compensation
- MOLLIE MOSMAN (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $103,565 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Creating community ownership that preserves affordability and inclusivity is the mission of the city of lakes community land trust.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024 the clclt assisted 48 new households achieve clclt homeownership in minneapolis, bringing the total number of homes in trust to 415 via ground lease and deed restrictions. Construction on the clclt's two largest projects, the 628 (7-unit condominium complex) and harrison townhomes (17-units), were completed in 2024. Closings on individual harrison townhomes started in april 2024 and the 628 in october 2024. Additionally, the clclt acquired fifteen new properties through its homebuyer initiated program; four homes through partnerships with other nonprofit developers; one through the seller-leveraged program; three through project: sustained legacy; three existing contract for deed holders refinanced into conventional mortgage; and three contract for deeds were cancelled. Of all households served in 2024, 61% were from communities of color, and the average area median income was 51.06%in addition to the 415 homes in trust at year-end 2024, the clclt also owns and maintains four rental properties, the clclt office building, and several additional properties under development in minneapolis. Each of these properties will remain perpetually affordable with no or very little additional affordability investment being needed again. As of year-end 2024 the clclt had also facilitated a total of 132 resales. It's important to note that no new public investments were needed to create affordability for the 134 resales due to the long-term affordability mechanism built into the community land trust. The resales represent 134 low- and moderate-income households who were assisted into homeownership without the clclt needing to raise additional funds to keep the homes affordable despite rapidly rising home values in minneapolis and increasing interest rates nationally. Although construction costs stabilized slightly in 2024, the impact continues to be felt on construction projects. Even though public funders have begun to adjust their per unit affordability or development gap maximum subsidy levels, the clclt remains cautious about taking on development projects without ample gap resources or definitive permanent financing sources available to ensure the homes are priced affordably at completion.in 2024 the clclt sponsored over 28 clclt orientations. Continuing to provide virtual orientations has allowed the clclt to offer orientations without limiting the number of attendees due to space restrictions. Additionally, the clclt participated in four community events and facilitated four community conversations. Through these outreach opportunities, the clclt estimates it was able to inform over 1,000 community members about community land trust homeownership and the clclt's paths into homeownership. Additionally, the clclt continues to meet with homebuyers virtually, present to neighborhoods and social/human service providers, and other stakeholders about homebuyer opportunities in the community and through the clclt way of homeownership. At year's end, clclt was staffed by 6.8 fte. Other significant events in 2024: clclt's long-time finance director transitioned out of the organization in november 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $274.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.94; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.