City Memorial Perpetual Care Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990224731
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8085478066
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,825
- Expenses
- $23,134
- Assets
- $320,636
- Liabilities
- $33,641
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THOMAS DENNISON (PRESIDENT)
- KATHLEEN MORIMOTO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- THOMAS DENNISON (PRESIDENT)
- KIMBERLY VIERRA (SECRETARY / TREASURER / DIRECTOR)
- KATHLEEN MORIMOTO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990-ez, part iii, line 28, program service accomplishments: the organization shall be organized exclusively for the following purposes: to accept funds for the perpetual care of cemetery premises and to invest and administer the same in such securities as the board of directors of this organization of such officer or officers or agent or agents designated by the board of directors shall deem appropriate, or to cause the same to be invested and administrated by an agent or agents, corporate or otherwise, appointed by the board of directors, and to provide any and all facilities and engage in any and all activities incidental to the operation of the cemetery.to care, maintain and upkeep the plots and grounds of city memorial park.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.4%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.86; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.