Citizens4community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811022094
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Sisters, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5412030527
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $256,342
- Expenses
- $181,353
- Assets
- $260,013
- Liabilities
- $673
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADAM KOLLER (PRESIDENT)
- JANE PAXSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLEN KLEIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLEN KLEIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Citizens4community fosters a connected community by encouraging civility, collaboration, and civic engagement in sisters country. It promotes civil communications and encourages collaboration and engagement in the region.
What it reported doing in 2025
C4c designs and produces local events, and programs that bring folks together, build trust, enable cooperation, cultivate local pride, and help everyone get engaged in the powerful act of community building. Key 2025 accomplishments included: civilitywe expanded our bi-annual community forums, adding complementary workshops, film screenings, and resource guides for attendees. In spring 2025 we hosted a 2-part series on wildfire preparedness and related insurance challenges, and in the fall we facilitated a retrospective discussion on lessons learned from the flat fire. We also served in a de facto community coordination role during and following the flat fire, helping to share factual information, connect victims with resources, raising funds for victims and first responders, and helping to maintain a positive community spirit during a time of major stress and uncertainty. Collaborationwe held twelve monthly community builders meetings at locations across sisters country, including the open door, seed to table farm, and pine meadow ranch. These meetings are a great way for local leaders and volunteers to share organizational updates and explore opportunities for collaboration. We also hosted 6 skill-building workshops for local leaders and launched a community volunteer dashboard (volunteerinsisters.org). We continue to serve as facilitators for the sisters country vision implementation team (vit), and led the development of a new website for the vision (sistersvision.org).in july 2025 we opened the hub - a new community space in downtown sisters offeringdonation-based coworking, bookable meeting areas, event rentals, supplies and resources fornonprofits, rotating showcases from local artists, and more.civic engagement12 additional residents graduated from the 2025 sisters civic leadership academy a crash course in local government operations and leadership skills. Several have already taken on new public service roles. Our 2025 momentum grants invested $10,000 in grassroots community projects, and the banner project once again cultivated hometown pride while celebrating the academic achievements of local youth.social connectionour let's get together event series brought together thousands of community members for contra dancing, caroling, outdoor movies, a pop-up children's museum, and more. And sisters 4th fest once again drew 1,000+ people to village green park for a "good ol' fashioned independence day." in total, we hosted over 35 events in 2025 that brought together over 4,000 community members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $34.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 71.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $129K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.