Citizens Alliance for Progress Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592299047
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tarpon Springs, FL, USA
Phone
7279345881
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$936,962
Expenses
$892,110
Assets
$1,523,997
Liabilities
$211,548

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS MCKONE (PRESIDENT)
  • DIANE PORTER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID O ARCHIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID O ARCHIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $78,528 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to deliver community-based services and partner with other service providers to empower and support individuals and families to foster their personal growth and development.

What it reported doing in 2024

Citizens alliance for progress, inc. Operates a neighborhood family center serving residents of tarpon springs and north pinellas county, Florida. Through a holistic approach, the organization provides programs and services that strengthen children, youth, families, and the community by promoting educational success, family stability, health and wellness, self-sufficiency, and positive youth development. The organization is also a licensed childcare provider.family support services assist families in achieving self-sufficiency through case management, referrals, financial literacy, educational advocacy, mental health referrals, and access to basic needs programs, including the low-income home energy assistance program (liheap), along with workshops and other supportive services.the organization's licensed after school academic enhancement program provided a safe, structured environment where students received homework assistance, academic tutoring, literacy enrichment, stem activities, technology instruction, recreation, and character development designed to improve academic achievement and promote positive youth development. The program also emphasized regular school attendance, healthy lifestyles, leadership development, and social-emotional learning.a strong emphasis was placed on parent and family engagement through parent conferences, educational workshops, family events, school navigation assistance, regular communication regarding student progress, volunteer opportunities, and activities that encouraged parents to become active partners in their children's education. These efforts strengthened family-school connections and promoted positive educational outcomes.additional program services included a summer career institute in partnership with st. Petersburg college that offered career exploration, college exposure, financial literacy, and workforce readiness training for middle and high school students; a summer enrichment camp designed to reduce summer learning loss for elementary students through educational and recreational activities; and a school food pantry serving students and their families.the organization also hosted community events, including a health fair providing school physicals, backpacks with school supplies, and community resources, as well as an oratorical contest, soul food festival, and community baby shower. Youth, families, volunteers, and staff also participated in the city of tarpon springs christmas parade and the dr. Martin luther king jr. Parade, demonstrating the organization's commitment to community engagement and civic participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.3%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 76.6%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.3% of revenue deployed · 76.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $683K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $79K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.