Citizens Against Physical Sexual and Emotional Abuse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251394232
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ridgway, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8147723838
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,961,955
- Expenses
- $1,293,637
- Assets
- $1,923,811
- Liabilities
- $1,076,625
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
- MARY JO PETERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOANNE B WEYANT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOANNE B WEYANT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $106,285 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Citizens against physical, sexual, and emotional abuse (capsea) inc. Is committed to providing education to communities and confidential, trauma-informed, individualized services to all people impacted by violence, abuse, and crime through elk and cameron counties.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy: individual/ advocacy: individual advocacy was provided to victims/survivors/witnesses of crime by helping them secure services through preparation for the service or court process, accompaniment to other agency and assistance in that process, and/or speaking up intheir behalf, when requested and in partnership with the victims/survivors. This would include advocacy services at a child advocacy center by the capsea victim/witness staff. 861 victims/witnesses received individual advocacy throughout elk and cameron counties. This is an increase of 583 crime victims since 21/22. Systems advocacy: capsea staff include contacts made for the purpose of effecting policy and/or procedural change in order to improve a system's response to survivors of domestic violence/ipv/sexual assault/serious crime victims/witnesses. 115 systems advocacy contactswere conducted during the past year throughout elk and cameron counties. This is an increase of 95 contacts from 21/22.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.1%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $54.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.1% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $940K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.