Cit Montana Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461791699
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Helena, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4064980315
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $188,932
- Expenses
- $185,185
- Assets
- $20,188
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANE HILDENSTAB (PRESIDENT)
- GREG HOLMLUND (VICE PRESIDENT BEGINNING 4/2025)
- JULIE PRIGMORE (VICE PRESIDENT UNTIL 4/2025)
People named in this filing
- SHANE HILDENSTAB (PRESIDENT)
- GREG HOLMLUND (VICE PRESIDENT BEGINNING 4/2025)
- JULIE PRIGMORE (VICE PRESIDENT UNTIL 4/2025)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist law enforcement officers, detention staff, dispatchers and first responders of many community service providers in engaging, assessing, and assisting individuals in crisis with mental and/or co-occurring substance disorders.
What it reported doing in 2024
Crisis intervention team (cit) academies in each cit community in Montana. Academies are 40- hour trainings approved by post credit. Individuals attending the Montana law enforcement academy (mlea) were also taught crisis de-escalation skills during their training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.