The CineStory Foundation
Legal name: Cinestory Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364169083
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3104971961
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $333,152
- Expenses
- $330,909
- Assets
- $146,702
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lisanne Sartor (Board President)
Highest reported compensation
- Colette Sartor (Executive Dir.): $35,000 total reported compensation
- Lisanne Sartor (CREATIVE DIR.): $28,000 total reported compensation
- Rajiv Reddy (Creative Dir.): $27,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CineStory is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to educating emerging TV writers and screenwriters.
What it reported doing in 2025
CineStory List of Accomplishments, Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2026: CINESTORY held its Feature Retreat from October 3 7, 2025 in Idyllwild, CA, with 41 participating screenwriters, 11 staff members, 7 interns, and 46 mentors. The mentors all are working entertainment industry professionals. CineStory did three one-hour, pre-retreat online orientations, one for screenwriters, one for staff, and one for mentors. During the four-day retreat, CineStory provided snacks, a light breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day for everyone. There were 15 mentor-led educational sessions spread out over the four and one-half day retreat, including panel discussions and group writing exercises on topics like screenplay structure, the ins and out of working as a professional screenwriter, how to work with producers, agents, and managers, how to write visually, and how to craft a pitch that will sell a screenplay. The participating screenwriters also each met with three different mentors in one-on-one notes sessions for feedback on projects mentors had read in advance. Notes sessions were each one and one-half hours long. In addition, there were numerous social gatherings for writers and mentors to get to know each other.CineStory held its TV Retreat on May 1 5, 2026 in Idyllwild, CA, with 42 participating writers, 11 staff members, 7 interns, and 50 mentors. The mentors all are working entertainment industry professionals. CineStory did three one-hour, pre-retreat orientations online, one for screenwriters, one for staff, and one for mentors. During the four and one-half day retreat, CineStory provided snacks, a light breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day for everyone. There were 15 mentor-led educational sessions spread out over the retreat, including topics and writing exercises like teleplay structure, the ins and out of working as a professional TV writer, how to work with producers, agents, and managers, how to write visually, and how to craft a pitch that will sell a teleplay, as well as mock TV writing rooms, one drama room and one comedy room, each led by showrunner mentors. In addition, the writers each met with three different mentors in one-on-one notes sessions for feedback on projects mentors had read in advance. Notes sessions were each one and one-half hours long. In addition, there were daily social gatherings for writers and mentors. In addition, there were numerous social gatherings for writers and mentors to get to know each other.Cinestory also held its second Residency, which was a week-long event from June 12 19, 2026 in Idyllwild, CA, with 11 residents and 8 staff members. The residency focused on generative writing and community building and included housing, all meals, plus places to write, meet in small groups, and socialize as a community. In addition to having plenty of unstructured writing time, residents met daily in small groups led by CineStory staffers to do writing exercises and story breaking sessions aimed at helping residents develop the project they brought to work on. There were also places to take short, unscheduled breaks throughout the day for those who need a quick breather before diving back into their work. Finally, residents and staffers gathered for meals, games, and socializing.More information on CineStorys activities and accomplishments at https://cinestory.org/news/
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 52.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $174K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.