Cincinnati Parks Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311429016
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Phone
5138610023
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,518,246
Expenses
$6,337,997
Assets
$22,816,201
Liabilities
$59,716

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

41 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN TIFFANY (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER SPIESER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER SPIESER (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $190,372 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our city's parks and greenspaces.

What it reported doing in 2025

Cincinnati parks foundation is the primary philanthropic partner to cincinnati parks. We raise private support to keep our parks clean, green, beautiful and welcoming to everyone. In 2025, we continued investing in our city's 200-year-old park system, planting new acorns for a healthier, more connected future. For 30 years, cincinnati parks foundation has invested more than $110 million in clean, green, beautiful and welcoming parks across our city. 12.81 tons of litter removed at oblitterators cleanups. Advanced capital projects at owl's nest park and glenway park. Over 1,500 trees planted through our conservation funds.1,749 volunteers contributed 13,744 hours. Efforts were made in 2025 in 4 key areas: create we made meaningful progress on priority park improvements, including: completing fundraising for the $4.1 million owl's nest park renovation to restore the historic pavilion and improve accessibility, lighting, landscaping and park entrances. Supporting programming at the sawyer point riverfront rink and preparing for a 2026 campaign to reimagine the rink and rebuild the playground lost to fire. Continuing work on the next phase of the smale riverfront park expansion in partnership with cincinnati parks. Celebrating the grand opening of the mt. Airy forest bike skills course, created in partnership with cincinnati parks and the cincinnati off road alliance (cora). Conserve we focused on protecting and strengthening cincinnati's natural spaces by: planting 1554 trees through let's grow local and cincinnati fall releaf. Funding invasive species removal throughout cincinnati parks. Celebrating our 413 oblitterators volunteers who donated 835 hours to remove over 25,000 pounds of trash in cincinnati parks. Connect we helped make cincinnati parks places that bring people together. In 2025, we supported: over 200 community-led events through cincinnati parks advisory councils (cpacs). Hundreds of families at smale riverfront park family fun days, featuring music, games, activities, book giveaways with queen city book bank and ellen's heart & soul book club, and free bicycle helmets provided with support from the cincinnati fire department and fire foundation. More than 9000 roller skaters at the riverfront rink in partnership with skate downtown cincinnati. Wellness we launched the award-winning cincinnati parks + rec for wellness, delivering free, accessible wellness programming, in partnership with cincinnati parks, cincinnati recreation commission, the osher center for integrative health at the university of cincinnati and community partners. Together, we provided: 300 free classes and docent led hikes 12,000+ participants in programs across 22 parks a 19% repeat participation rate 100+ park prescription referrals from uc health providers. 15 physicians actively prescribing wellness in cincinnati parks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.6; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $190K · 41 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.