Cibola General Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850141285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Grants, NM, US
- Phone
- 505-287-4446
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,269,089
- Expenses
- $63,083,050
- Assets
- $55,340,880
- Liabilities
- $8,127,506
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIA ATENCIO (ACTING CEO)
- THOMAS WHELAN (OUTGOING CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR STACEY DIMITT (CHIEF OF MEDICAL STAFF/MEMBER): $509,392 total reported compensation
- SNOW MARIKA PETERSEN (PHYSICIAN): $508,643 total reported compensation
- AMANDA YOUNG (PHYSICIAN): $466,295 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To deliver quality care to the local community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provides patient care to the residents of grants, New Mexico and outlying communities without regard to ability to pay. There are appoximately 27,000 residents in the cibola county, nm community. Cibola county hospital utilizes state of the art equipment and the highest health care standards to provide quality health care. During the fiscal year, the organization had about 755 inpatient admissions served in its 25-bed facility. The hospital also had about 24,058 outpatient visits, 14,578 emergency room visits, and about 28,362 clinic visits. The organization's staff work hard to meet patient needs and they feel every patient encounter is an accomplishment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.3%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 57.3% of revenue deployed · 75.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $509K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.3M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.