Church Partnership Evangelism Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841417153
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boise, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2083314096
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $528,809
- Expenses
- $479,882
- Assets
- $1,016,297
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- DUSTY BENNER (VICE CHAIRMA)
- JIM EVANS (TREASURER)
- JOHN VAN HOOGAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Propagation of the gospel through evangelism, discipleship and church planting.
What it reported doing in 2024
Training the trainers (ttt) in cpe's evangelism and discipleship strategy was carried forward in 3rd and 4th generation trainings multiple states in india (approximately 13) while in 3 states in india new projects began resulting in the planting of 29 new churches. A pilot project in partnership with indian team members was started in sri lanka in may. The nepal ministry expanded to plant 2 new churches. In indonesia 43 new ttt's were conducted providing training for 704 trainees and the planting of 53 new house churches. Two onsite trainings took place in bangkok, thailand in phnom penh, cambodia in march by joel van hoogen. An additional training in the battambang province of cambodia was conducted in the fall of 2024 under the leadership of kelly carnahan. Ongoing coaching with trainers in india, indonesia, the philippines, tanzania, uganda, kenya, ecuador, colombia and cambodia and the united states and canada continue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $2,063.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $331K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.