Timbercrest Senior Living

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
350960298
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
North Manchester, IN, United States
Phone
260-982-2118
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,527,551
Expenses
$15,836,634
Assets
$33,292,942
Liabilities
$14,740,009

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTY HUIRAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTY HUIRAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $165,302 total reported compensation
  • ALISON CREAGER (LPN): $150,913 total reported compensation
  • SHANNA PRATER (RN): $144,222 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Serve our residents through mission-driven, nonprofit senior living and total care. A Not-for-Profit Charitable Organization As a nonprofit, we have one goal: to serve our residents. Enabling our community members to experience “the good life” that comes with security, quality healthcare, social engagement, wellness programming, opportunities for spiritual enrichment, and living a life of meaning and purpose is both our mission and our passion. This sense of mission and the values underlying it permeate all facets of our community, including our Board of Directors and our team members. In short, we are here to further the dignity of every community member through our care, programming, residences, and campus lifestyle.

What it reported doing in 2025

At timbercrest, we are dedicated to providing a warm and supportive community where seniors can enjoy life with dignity, comfort, and peace of mind. Our continuum of care ensures that as needs change, residents have access to the right level of support-from independent living apartments, to assisted living, to healthcare services that provide skilled and compassionate care, which include but not limited to dietary and social services. This seamless approach allows residents to remain part of the timbercrest family throughout every stage of life.** continued on schedule o **timbercrest is committed to a charitable care program in order to facilitate the continuity of care; serving not only those who can afford care but also those who may outlive their financial resources. Timbercrest has an arrangement whereby the licensed residential care facility and licensed skilled nursing facility and the associated revenues were transferred to woodlawn hospital. The amount of charitable assistance provided, under the aforementioned arrangement, was $2,730,000 during the year.the continuum of care at timbercrest is more than just a service-it is a mission. It reflects our promise to offer security, compassion, and belonging to every resident, while living out our christian values of care, generosity, and community support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $165K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.