Church of Religious Science of Redlands

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953625962
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Redlands, CA, USA
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$54,212
Expenses
$64,266
Assets
$134,375
Liabilities
$111,292

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Edward Torres (Board President Trustee)
  • Ann Spear (Board Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Chitjian (Practitioner Emeritus)
  • Edward Torres (Board President Trustee)
  • Audrey Nesvold (Board Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Church of Religious of Redlands is identified as a Church. We service the community with spiritual and religious classes and teachings of Earnest Holmes. We were incorporated in 1955.

What it reported doing in 2023

Raising funds for the Ukraine assisting two Centers that seek funds for Clothing books and other items for children and young adults by providing Concerts and events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 6%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.09; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 6% of revenue deployed · 5.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.