Church of Grace

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872143654
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6026971200
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,003
Expenses
$18,617
Assets
$2,172
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bryan Hansen (President)

People named in this filing

  • Bryan Hansen (President)
  • Tina Hansen (Secratary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Church Our primary purpose is to put out educational material about Christianity and to teach the Bible. Our secondary purpose is to help the fatherless and the poor.

What it reported doing in 2022

Our primary purpose is to educate people on Christianity we spent 12314 dollars delivering christian educational material to households in America. In our world wide effort we spent 1870 dollars supporting missionaires and the materials that they need another major purpose of our church is to help the poor and the fatherless we spent 3531 dollars for orphans in Haiti and to help send poor children to school in Paupa New Guina and in supporting poor young adults thru Foster your Future.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 94.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 67.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.