Chrysalis Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932712501
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Coeur Dalene, ID, USA
Phone
2087702770
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$880,649
Expenses
$573,270
Assets
$572,060
Liabilities
$130,148

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERRI JOHNSON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERRI JOHNSON (CEO): $63,597 total reported compensation
  • DAVE JOHNSON (BOARD CHAIR): $345 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Chrysalis is dedicated to empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities by providing personalized developmental therapy, engaging community-based services, and supportive programs that foster independence, enhance life skills, and promote full participation in the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Chrysalis offers comprehensive support through additional services, including behavioral intervention services and evaluations for children and adult developmental evaluations for adults. Trained professionals provide tailored interventions to address specific behavioral challenges, enhance social skills, and promote overall well-being. Comprehensive assessments enable the creation of personalized plans that effectively address individual needs, fostering independence and improving quality of life. These programs are integral to our mission of empowering individuals with developmental disabilities through personalized support and skill development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.1%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 73.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 73% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 91.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.1% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $425K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $64K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.