Good Days
Legal name: Chronic Disease Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611462062
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Frisco, TX, United States
- Phone
- (877) 968-7233
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $272,241,160
- Expenses
- $158,835,025
- Assets
- $317,070,065
- Liabilities
- $5,956,024
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLORINDA WALLEY (PRESIDENT / CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CLORINDA WALLEY (PRESIDENT / CEO): $603,739 total reported compensation
- RANDALL ODEBRALSKI (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $453,729 total reported compensation
- MAUREEN VIGNAUX (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $363,784 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our vision is to help create a world where no one has to choose between treatment and the necessities of life. Join us and help make that vision a reality. See our open positions below: _If you are interested in a position with Good Days as a Care Navigator, feel. Good Days is a national non-profit charitable organization that lifts the burdens of chronic illness through assistance, advocacy, and education. About Us. About Us Millions go without life-changing treatments, simply because of cost.
What it reported doing in 2025
Providing assistance to under-insured individuals with chronic diseases, cancer, or other life-altering conditions to help them obtain the treatment they need. We assist individuals throughout the united states and territories who meet income qualification guidelines and have private insurance or a government-sponsored insurance plan, but cannot afford the co-payments for their fda-approved therapies. Whenever administratively feasible (and in most cases), we pay the individuals out-of-pocket costs for their treatment directly to the applicable pharmacies or providers. The organization provided financial assistance to 97,200 individuals and paid for over 350,000 claims.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $352.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 56.9% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $604K · 16 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.8M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.