CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF Southeast Texas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760136274
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Beaumont, TX, USA
Phone
4092367555
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,931,169
Expenses
$1,632,013
Assets
$16,299,470
Liabilities
$4,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL M TREVINO (DIRECTOR/CEO CH-SETX)
  • TERI HAWTHORNE (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL M TREVINO (DIRECTOR/CEO CH-SETX): $1,038,093 total reported compensation
  • TERI HAWTHORNE (Executive Director): $138,001 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christus health foundation of southeast Texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast Texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast Texas.

What it reported doing in 2024

CHRISTUS Health Foundation of Southeast Texas is a Texas non-profit organization serving the philanthropic needs of CHRISTUS Health Southeast Texas (the "Health System"). It is the Foundation's responsibility to encourage and receive contributions from individuals, corporations, associations, and foundations. These contributions are distributed to the Health System and its subsidiary non-profit hospitals, in accordance with the intentions of the donors and within the confines of the Foundation's goals and objectives. All contributions assist the Health System in providing continuing high quality health care in areas such as modernization and construction of needed hospital facilities, acquisition of hospital equipment, and other special health care needs of the Health System. The Foundation also sponsors the Children's Miracle Network (CMN) for children's health services in the community. Funds raised for the CMN are restricted to provide needed equipment and improvements to the Pediatric and Obstetrical Care Units of the supported hospitals. The CMN Grant Assistance Program focuses on children with healthcare needs who may require financial assistance. Grants are awarded when specific criteria and guidelines are met. The Foundation sponsors other local events to provide support for coronary care, oncology and hyperbaric treatment. The Foundation's sole corporate member is CHRISTUS HEALTH SOUTHEAST TEXAS; CHRISTUS HEALTH SOUTHEAST TEXAS' sole corporate member is CHRISTUS Health.CHRISTUS Health Southeast Texas includes all of the hospitals, clinics, services and other ministries of CHRISTUS Health located in the Beaumont, Port Arthur, and Jasper areas of Texas. A myriad of other health services, such as physician offices, clinics, outpatient services and programs are located throughout the eight-county area served by CHRISTUS Health Southeast Texas. CHRISTUS Health was formed in 1999 to strengthen the 153-year-old, faith-based health care ministries of the Congregations of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word of Houston and San Antonio. Founded on the mission "to extend the healing ministry of Jesus Christ," CHRISTUS is challenged to reach out to, and beyond, the more than 60 communities we serve to help those in need. CHRISTUS Health responds to the health care needs of its communities through services provided at more than 60 hospitals and long-term care facilities, 175 clinics and outpatient centers, and other community health ministries and community development ventures. CHRISTUS services can be found in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Texas, six provinces of Mexico, Colombia and Chile. Although programs may differ from facility to facility, each of our health care entities has the same objective -- which is to lead the way to a healthier community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $175.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 44.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.99; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.