Christopher Street West Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953736454
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burbank, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8185670040
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Lesbian, Gay Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,263,206
- Expenses
- $4,697,683
- Assets
- $577,265
- Liabilities
- $3,534,795
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GERALD GARTH (PRESIDENT)
- NOAH GONZALEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GERALD GARTH (PRESIDENT)
- NOAH GONZALEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN WELLIVER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create safe and inclusive spaces for self-expression and celebration, and honor the unique heritage and diverse cultures of greater los angeles' lgbtq+ community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pride in the parkla pride ticketed festival: "la pride in the park," a ticketed one-day music festival, was held on saturday, june 8, 2024 at la state historic park, los angeles. The headliner, ricky martin, was joined by lgbtq+ artists including muna, jojo siwa, sasha velour, the cast of hbo's series, "we're here," tokischa, and others. Over 40 local small businesses, nonprofit , healthcare/public services exhibitors, city agencies, corporate sponsors, and la's professional sports teams offered products, games, and services. Dedicated activations were provided for the trans community, the sober community, and other special interest groups. A drone show was presented for the first time in la pride history. Ticket discounts were given to active military, veterans, first responders, educators, and civil servants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -107.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.12; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.