Christina Seix Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261321646
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Trenton, NJ, US
- Phone
- (609) 643-0400
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,645,442
- Expenses
- $15,373,375
- Assets
- $66,593,925
- Liabilities
- $691,997
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT L CONNOR (SECRETARY/HEADMASTER): $604,838 total reported compensation
- SAKEENAH BOYD (DIR. OF HEALTH & WELLNESS): $206,465 total reported compensation
- IVY GREEN JONES (SR. DIR. OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS): $157,286 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our purpose is to empower extraordinary young people to grow 'From Potential to Achievement' by addressing the systemic educational and other barriers that have historically held back children from marginalized communities. We prepare students to succeed in highly selective independent schools, which in turn provides them with rigorous academic development and access to a vast array of experiences, resources, and networks. We believe these educational opportunities enable our graduates to succeed in their own right, effect positive change, and become leaders in and beyond their communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Opened and operated school: after four years of preparation, the christina seix academy opened to 70 pre-kindergarten and kindergarten students on september 4, 2012. Instructional staffing resulted in a student to teacher ratio of 5 to 1 for an extended day (8 am to 4:30 pm), extended year (245 day) program. Rigorous reading, math, and development curricula were implemented with extensive professional development for staff. The academy admissions office implemented a comprehensive admissions program that admitted the first students from an initial applicant pool of 300. In support of student needs, the academy implemented a heath & wellness program, including increased child screenings for vision, asthma, and dental issues. To ensure students are well-equipped for academic success, the academy nutrition program provides breakfast, lunch, and two snacks daily, free of charge to students. Student parents and caregivers participate in a variety of free programming provided through the academy family center, including english as a second language education, employment counseling assistance, and social service referrals, in addition to campus events.construction of the christina seix academy campus, comprising 10 buildings on 65 acres, was completed in august 2012. Completion of campus construction enabled opening of the academy to students, and incorporated energy-efficient systems and structures as well as leed-certified building materials and methods.the academy purchased 5 acres of adjacent land from the state of New Jersey for future expansion of the campus.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.33; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $605K · 9 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.