Christian Womens Job Corp of Lamesa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200947588
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Lamesa, TX, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,477
Expenses
$109,873
Assets
$78,637
Liabilities
$779

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIANA HENDERSON (Vice President)
  • KAREN A PRESLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • BOBBY C GONZALES (Director)
  • DIANA HENDERSON (Vice President)
  • JOHN HEGI (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian womens job corps of lamesa is a ministry to emplower women to discover and pursue their dreams by starting them on a course of job skills, life skills, and self-esteem enhancement.

What it reported doing in 2022

Christian womens job corp takes women from welfare to work, from dependency to self-sufficiency, and if applicable, from non-structured homes lives to discplined, productive families that know how to manage a budget. While working on this aspect of training, cwcj introduces them to or increase their knowledge of the christian faith and show them how to enhance their lives spiritually through a personal relationship with jesus christ.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.