Christian Veterinary Mission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852465430
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lynnwood, WA, United States
- Phone
- (206) 801-5511
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Veterinary Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,138,410
- Expenses
- $8,740,415
- Assets
- $13,468,218
- Liabilities
- $677,937
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR LEE MYERS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR LEE MYERS (CEO): $147,302 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CVM sends volunteers around the world to share Christ’s love by serving through veterinary medicine. _Trip Deposit_** – A trip deposit of $250 will be due upon acceptance into the Apprenticeship program. This deposit confirms your place on a trip as well as helps to provide accounting and receipting of funds raised and expenses incurred, medical evacuation insurance, and other administrative costs. _Fundraising_** – An approved Apprentice must engage in fundraising for a portion of their trip costs. All of CVM’s short and long-term mission candidates are responsible forraising support for their work through their church, family, friends, and other contacts. _Reporting_** – Complete a post-trip report to share the apprentice’s experience and how they saw God at work.
What it reported doing in 2024
The professional development and spiritual wellness (pdsw) department prioritized programs that promote (1) workforce education and growth, and (2) holistic wellness of cvm supporters (those engaged in prayer, giving, and service) and cvm staff (both cvm USA and international field workers). A significant accomplishment in fy25 was the transition of the cvm elearning platform from learnupon to moodle by grow2serve. The elearning platform has more than 4000 users with 83 courses hosted. The new platform, moodle, is simpler for the end-user to learn and for the staff to upload and manage materials. It is also much less expensive, which was an added advantage. Moodle was launched in late fy25. A second major achievement was the enrichment of the cvm wellbeing program. Short-term mission leaders received training for their team members to write their personal testimonies and to share them. The training was recorded and posted on the cvm elearning platform to equip other ministry leaders with this valuable evangelism resource. Wellbeing also launched a 7-month re: generation course that met weekly online with 18 participants completing the course materials. The course culminated in a face-to-face commencement held in conjunction with the second cvm spiritual retreat in the spring. The course and dual retreat were great successes and will be repeated in fy26. A third major fy25 achievement was the advancement of the cvm podcast, two roads crossing. This podcast explores the intersection of faith and veterinary medicine by sharing interviews with speakers who engage in these areas in different capacities. We hosted our 100th episode this year, and podcast grew by about 1,515 views per month. Our major platforms are: cvmapp (104), apple (451), spotify (126), rumble (762), youtube(72). Faithful subscribers increased from 466 to 662. Moving forward into fy26, the programs within pdsw will migrate to other departments. The elearning platform will move to the missions department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.