Christian Transformation Foundation West Dallas Dba Serve West Dallas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264441043
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9016922782
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Urban, Community Economic Development
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,895
- Expenses
- $111,909
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- Denise Nixon (Operating Board)
- Robert Covington (Operating Board)
- Jeff Swan (Opearting Board)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to create and oversee strategic initiatives that address gaps in services to help meet the needs of our West Dallas neighbors and to show the love of Christ. Significant activites are to manage and coordinate human and financial resources to effect the social, economic, educational, and religious transformation of West Dallas. The organization supports and promotes the activities of churches and other organizations in West Dallas and is primarily funded by individual, church, and foundation contributions.
What it reported doing in 2019
Christian Transformation Foundation West Dallas Utilized its resources in order to support and collaborate the efforts of existing ministries, churches, and organizations in identifying, understanding, and priortizing the needs of various ministries operating in West Dallas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 30
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -149.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 30.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.