Christian Tech Center Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881085380
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Longwood, FL, USA
Phone
4075458090
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,181
Expenses
$79,505
Assets
$174,490

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDRE KLASS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANDRE KLASS (PRESIDENT)
  • REYES ANTONIO JR (DIRECTOR)
  • ANDREWS ADRIAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing complimentary computer technical support and equipment to individuals and families in need. Program service accomplishments: 1. Community computer redeployment program: we collect donated desktop and laptop computers, refurbish them to meet current technological standards, and distribute them at no cost to individuals and families lacking access to essential technology. This initiative empowers recipients by enhancing their educational and employment opportunities. 2. Complimentary computer repair services: we offer free computer repair and maintenance services to those in need, ensuring that individuals and families can maintain reliable access to technology for their daily activities, education, and job-related tasks. 3. Functionality guidance and training: we provide personalized assistance and training to help individuals effectively use technology. This service includes guidance on essential software applications, internet safety, and best practices.

What it reported doing in 2025

Providing complimentary computer technical support and equipment for individuals and families in need. Persons benefitted up to 1000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.4%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 48.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 26.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 58.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.