Christian Home Health Care
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743252227
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3138237700
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $426,467
- Expenses
- $890,124
- Assets
- $310,611
- Liabilities
- $766,928
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VICKIE THOMPSON-SANDY (PRESIDENT/CHAIR)
Highest reported compensation
- VICKIE THOMPSON-SANDY (PRESIDENT/CHAIR): $273,159 total reported compensation
- KEN ULRICH (TREASURER): $207,286 total reported compensation
- LEIGH MCLEOD (SECRETARY): $174,981 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. The organization was founded on christian principles and shall promote and support spiritual, loving, gracious healthy care for persons in need.
What it reported doing in 2015
Christian home health care offers a comprehensive medical care program to those still living in their homes. Our services provide the best in-home care and are delivered by our staff of exceptional professionals. Christian home health care offers a range of skilled services and support while you are recovering at home from a stay in the hospital or a nursing facility. We also assist in case of a reoccurence from a medical condition that requires professional assistance with physical, occupational or speech therapy. Christian home care will give you the attention you need in the privacy and comfort of your own home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -108.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.47; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 55.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $890K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $273K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $141K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.