Christian Home Educators Community of Longview
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812335408
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Longview, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9034526074
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,154
- Expenses
- $58,642
- Assets
- $39,059
- Liabilities
- $6,616
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAYNE GILL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RAYNE GILL (PRESIDENT)
- TABITHA HALL (TREASURER)
- APRIL ANDERSON (SERVICE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Christian home educators community of longview provides service and support to christian homeschooling families by 1) aiding in establishment and growth of christian homeschooling families in the community, 2) encouraging families to protect their right to homeschool and protect future freedoms to homeschool in the community, state of Texas, and in the nation, 3) promoting and providing sound, high quality homeschooling programs for the purpose of developing christ-like character which will satisfy the spiritual, intellectual, physical, and emotional needs of children, 4) reviewing and assimilating curriculum, information, and products that might be of aid to christian homeschool families, and 5) planning and conducting meetings and seminars to encourage and strengthen homeschooling families.
What it reported doing in 2023
Christian home educators community of longview sponsors various events to provide opportunities for homeschooled students to participate in large and small group activities for academic, social and character-building purposes. Examples include graduation, field trips, and high school prom.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.