Christian Help Inc of Mingo County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550750315
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Kermit, WV, USA
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $468,209
- Expenses
- $463,482
- Assets
- $887,911
- Liabilities
- $68,749
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Teresa McCune (President)
- Rebecca Hooker (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Eddie Hatcher (Board Member)
- Charles Galer (Board Member)
- Jack Spradaro (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Organization provides utility and rent assistance as well as clothing, furniture, and transportation for citizens of Mingo County, WV, and Martin County, Ky.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization provided utilities, and rent assistance through their Direct Aid Program. Through the Direct Aid Program, the organization also gave out Christmas baskets and Easter baskets. They also provided dental and medical assistance, car repairs and fuel, plus food and shelter assistance. The organization also provided transportation for medical/dental visits as well as grocery shopping for the citizens of Mingo County, West Virginia and Martin County, Kentucky.The Organization purchased a house (Hospitality House) at the end of 2022. Hospitality House will be rented to volunteer groups that come into the area to perform repairs to homes for citizens of the area. The rent will be very reasonable and provide the volunteers with clean, safe lodging. Hospitality House will also be available to donors and potential donors that wish to visit the area and review how their donations have made a difference in the lives of the residents
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 74.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $344K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.