Christian Counseling Associates Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521232628
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Columbia, MD, USA
Phone
4107073840
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Mental Health Center
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,578
Expenses
$59,371
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Grady Dale Jr (President)

People named in this filing

  • Candace Smith-Tucker (Director)
  • Grady Dale Jr (President)
  • Troy Parrish (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian Counseling Associates, Inc. was formed for the purpose of aiding and assisting the church of Jesus Christ in its various denomonations by: (1) providing counseling services consistent with Scripture and counseling theories, (2) providing psychological evaluations, (3) providing classes and speakers on topics of mental health from a Christian perspective, and (4) providing training and supervision for Christian professional trainees..

What it reported doing in 2023

Christian Counseling Associates, Inc. terminated in 2023 and while it provided counseling services to numerous clients prior to 2023, no services were rendered this year. In prior years pastors from local churches referred parishoners to CCA with confidence that therapists would be consistent with the Scriptures in their counsel. Clients searched the internet specifically for Christian based counseling and have been glad to find CCA with its distinctly Christian perspective. CCA did not discriminate and non-Christians have also benefitted from services with a Christian perspective.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -683.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.