Christian Community Homes and Services Inc Group Return
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912052713
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Hudson, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7153869303
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,212,545
- Expenses
- $20,075,988
- Assets
- $21,487,378
- Liabilities
- $16,776,517
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARYL SIMONSON (PRESIDENT (THRU MAY))
- CLAIRE ZAJAC (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PAMELA KLINGFUS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PAMELA KLINGFUS (CEO): $215,861 total reported compensation
- JAMES KACZROWSKI (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $158,209 total reported compensation
- JENNIE ORMAN (HUDSON ADMINISTRATOR): $141,679 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a nonprofit, faith-based organization offering senior living communities dedicated to serving individuals in ways that reflect the importance of each unique life.
What it reported doing in 2025
Christian community home of hudson, inc. Is a 50 bed nursing home (cch-hudson), a 38-unit community based residential facility (pine ridge), and a 92-unit apartment complex which includes a 20-unit residential care apartment complex (wintergreen). Christian community home of osceola, inc. Is a 40-bed nursing home (cch-osceola) and an 18-unit community based residential facility (hearthside). Health care services to medicaid nursing home and cbrf residents are considered part of the organization's benefit provided to the community since a substantial portion of such services are reimbursed at amounts less than the costs of providing care. For 2025, cch-hudson's total nursing home resident days were 12,832. Cch-osceola's total nursing home resident days were 12,323.the nursing home offers skilled nursing care in both short-term rehabilitation programs and long-term care resident programs. Some of the specialized care services offered include wound care, pain management, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy.pine ridge & hearthside offers monitored care plans to residents giving them the comfort of knowing that additional care is available as they need it. Services offered at pine ridge include housekeeping, laundry, nursing assistance with activities of daily living, dietary services, medication management, and other nursing supervision and care services. Total resident days for 2025 were 13,206. Additionally, hearthside had 8,887 resident days for 2025.wintergreen provides seniors and handicapped persons with housing and services available to meet their needs. Among the many services provided are 24-hour on-site staff, assistance with medications and vital checks, transportation services, and assistance with daily cares. Total rental days at wintergreen apartments for 2025 were 37,647. Additionally, evergreen had 11,067 resident days for 2025.wintergreen apartments, inc. Is the real estate holding company and the lessor for the property and equipment in which christian community home of hudson, inc. Provides its operations. Christian community home of hudson, inc. Pays wintergreen apartments, inc. Monthly rent to lease the property and equipment.christian community campus foundation, inc. (foundation) is a fund development company for the organization. The foundation organizes events and projects which raise funds that allow for equipment upgrades, investment in campus enhancement projects, and expansion and enhancement of services. In 2025, christian community foundation, inc. Raised about $166,000 in funds for these purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.8% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $216K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.