Christian Aid Ministries Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453969752
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Berlin, OH, USA
Phone
330-893-4915
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Support N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,353,452
Expenses
$9,100,602
Assets
$29,884,859
Liabilities
$4,178,431

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David N Troyer (President)
  • Philip Troyer (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • David N Troyer (President): $149,745 total reported compensation
  • Philip Troyer (Vice President): $129,386 total reported compensation
  • Weston Showalter (Executive Committee Member): $114,143 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian Aid Ministries Foundation educates, motivates, and assists supporters in biblical stewardship planning. CAM Foundation can help you accomplish your giving vision. We can set up a giving account called a Donor Advised Fund, issue gift annuities that pay income streams for the rest of your life, hold business shares, and much more. CONTACT INFORMATION Mail: PO Box 290 | Berlin, OH 44610. We are an Amish-Mennonite Anabaptist organization that operates under the control of the Christian Aid Ministries Board. We help people with charitable hearts to give to the causes and needs that God has directed them to. The giver can realize a wonderful solution to the “Old Age Wealth Problem” converting it into Kingdom investment! Often taxes are converted to savings. Do you have land that will incur significant capital gains tax if you sell it? You may want to consider a partial gift to...

What it reported doing in 2025

Christian Aid Ministries Foundation makes grants and allocations to exempt organizations including churches and other publicly supported organizations. During the year, CAMF made grants to numerous organizations, totaling $8,317,924.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $111.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.8%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.28; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 33 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 85 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 69 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.