Christ Church Health Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453304372
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Augusta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7702351124
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $18,724
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Josie Tanner (Director)
- Julia Clark (Assistant Director)
- Megan Caudell (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Christ Church Health Clinic primary purpose is to provide quality patient - healthcare and screening to the medially marginalized in Richmond County, Georgia. During the COVID-19 pandemic this was done by raising money via events and via sales of goods to provide goods/products needed for basic healthcare to the medically marginalized. Expenses for the 2021 year totaled to $1,463.12 while income totaled to $1,095.62. With the non-profit liquidating after filing of 2021 tax return, the final remaining balance of the organization, including checking and savings, will be donated to Christ Community Health Services and The Equality Clinic of Augusta. Each organization is estimated to receive $9,361.97 of the remaining funds, which will leave CCHC with a net $0.00 balance. CCHC has no outstanding debts, payments, or financial obligations at the time of dissolution. After donations are made, bank accounts will be closed.
What it reported doing in 2021
No service accomplishments
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.