Christ Cares 4 U Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824317628
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Ellenboro, NC, USA
Phone
8286125021
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$291,064
Expenses
$261,344
Assets
$89,947
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT SCOTT HUFFMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • TERRI HUFFMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT SCOTT HUFFMAN (PRESIDENT): $40,000 total reported compensation
  • TERRI HUFFMAN (VICE PRESIDENT): $20,000 total reported compensation
  • LISA TESTER (FINANCIAL SECRETARY): $4,800 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ministry does charity and beneveloence ministris for campgrounds in the us. They provide food pantries, grocris, medical needs and other help to the homeless. Im2024 they supported victims of wnc huricane helene providing meals, groceries, propane heaters, hugiene supplies cleaning supplies, gift cards etc. They receive support for international mssions and train pastors to go to uganda and the south sudan. Provided support for two missions to brazil. They support "hands on" with tim tebow's "a nght to chine event for the mentally and physically challenged. They traveled to uganda, south sudan, tanzania, rwanda, honduras, el salvador, and peru. They distribute bibles and supplies and aid to those in need. They trainpastors and help in the building of churches in these countries.

What it reported doing in 2025

* International Travel/Lodging total $ 108,536.59 (Budget Line #111) - Expenses includes airfare, lodging, on ground travel, and food for every member of every team. Also resources needed for specific ministries. - Bibles (5,754 qty) was supplied into Uganda, Togo, and USA. - Uganda, We spent three months and two weeks in country; Provided resources for sickle cell ministry, prostitute/women ministry, pregnant women ministry needs, women learning a skill ministry, children ministry, and church planting. . Also evangelism and discipleship in multiple areas of the country. Provided food and hygiene items as well. A team of six joined us for two weeks. - Choice Bible Institute, purchased property to build a future building for educating pastors. - Togo, Trained pastors and church leaders in many locations, evangelizing, discipling, and distributing Bibles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 5
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 52.4%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $24.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Missing
    • Other executive compensation review process: Missing
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47% of revenue deployed · 52.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.