Choong Hyun Presbyterian Church of Oc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330460939
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Garden Grove, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2133839665
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,078
- Expenses
- $99,705
- Assets
- $87,199
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- HYOUNG KIM (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Choong hyun presbyterian church of oc exists to glorify to god by reaching people with the gospel of jesus christ, equipping them as growing disciples of jesus christ and sending them out to the community as servants of jesus christ. In order to accomplish this great mission god bestows us, we are focusing on four elements. ; 1. Evangelism our church communicates god's word through evangelism. We are ambassadors for christ and believe it is our responsibility to share the good news wherever we go. 2. Fellowship our church incorporates god's family into our fellowship. We provide a warm, authentic community, welcoming new believers into the body of christ. 3. Ministry our church demonstrates god's love through ministry or service. Ministry is showing god's love to others by meeting their needs and healing their hurts in the name of jesus. 4. Maturity. Our church educates god's people through discipleship to be developed as spiritually and socially mature people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 31.2%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 25% of revenue deployed · 31.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.