Choices Medical Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481141020
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3166872792
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $534,003
- Expenses
- $305,702
- Assets
- $1,096,785
- Liabilities
- $1,150
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAWNYA KITT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TAWNYA KITT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $55,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Choices medical clinic, inc., a christian non-profit clinic, has offered no-cost abortion alternatives to patients since 1999 - including perinatal hospice care for preborn infants with a terminal diagnosis.
What it reported doing in 2024
Choices medical clinic, inc., a christian non-profit clinic, has offered no-cost abortion alternatives to patients since 1999. With over 27,000 total patient visits including perinatal hospice care for preborn infants with a terminal diagnosis. Choices is an official rotation site for the via christi family medicine residency and sub-internship medical students, Kansas university school of medicine, Kansas city university school of osteopathic medicine and biosciences and the Kansas college of osteopathic medicine. All clinic sonographers are board certified and use state-of-the-art ultrasound. For fiscal year ending september 30, 2025 the clinic had 597 total patient visits, performed 408 ultrasounds, supported 9 perinatal hospice cases, hosted 29 physician rotations, 6 via christi family medicine residency, Kansas university school of medicine, Kansas city university school of osteopathic medicine and biosciences, Kansas college of osteopathic medicine and received 2,255 hours of assistance from 26 dedicated volunteers offering a full range of services and community referrals tailored to patient needs including adoption and practical support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 40.7%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $49.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.59; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 40.7% of revenue deployed · 69.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $211K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.